![]() ![]() ![]()
Trading Punches The Swordsman Insanity Circle Breath Pirates Mystic Force Hallowmoor Distress
Fall Comp 2008 Fall Comp 2007 Fall Comp 2006 Fall Comp 2005 Fall Comp 2004 Spring 2006 C32 Comp 2004 Misc Reviews
IntFiction Forum Older IF News Lunatix Online StarLock RPG About Me
IF Competition The IF Archive SPAG Online XYZZY News IF Database Baf's Guide IF Reviews The IF Wiki
![]() ![]()
|
![]() |
I skipped both steps for the 2006 Spring Thing. At first, I intended to use my IFComp 2005 criteria (http://www.sidneymerk.com/comp05/scoring.shtml). With only four entries - each being very different from any of the others and none of them being bad - I changed my mind. The final scores are kind of a hybrid between this and my 2004 C32 Comp system. Ranking them was no easy task. I was tempted to take the cheap way out and rate them all the same - "Spring Thing 2006: Every Game Gets a Ten!" The Potter and the Mould is action-packed with good scenery implementation, but Pantomime has great writing and a trippy storyline. The Warlord, The Princess & The Bulldog is a lengthy puzzlefest with multiple solutions and some clever gameplay mechanics, but The Baron stands apart from its competition with a well-told, thought-provoking story that lacks puzzles entirely. To decide on scores, I considered the writing, the story, the implementation, the length of the game, and the experience as a whole. Every entry was great in its own way. I am incredibly impressed with what each of these authors has done here, and any of them would make a fine Spring Thing winner. However, I did decide on scores, and so that they're meaningful, no two scores are the same.
|